| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Chronotis Responding to the most frequent suggestions in the last few pages: Make a separate bomber class for this new role However we feel that this approach would not work besides being the "path of least resistan...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.02 13:44:00
|
2. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Jo Shmo Check out right before your post about heavy stealth bombers, already came up with Tactical Stealth Bomber 7 posts above this post. Sorry Jo, I did get this idea from your post. Nice idea mate.
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.02 09:06:00
|
3. CCP Chronotis, we (at least some of us) love you! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Merin Ryskin Seriously. You may have crippled my Falcon, you may have still failed to fix my black ops, but bombers are now fixed, and that kind of makes up for it all. Ignore the whiners who can't figure out how to make to...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.02 09:05:00
|
4. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: retro mike Edited by: retro mike on 02/04/2009 07:37:10 So say we did have two seperate bombers would it be logical to think to call them: STEALTH PRECISION BOMBER the current cruise setup + a bonus to expl. radius/v...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.02 08:45:00
|
5. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Psytropic April Fools! Youre a day late lol but please tell me this is true!!!
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.02 07:39:00
|
6. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: retro mike on 02/04/2009 07:37:10 So say we did have two seperate bombers would it be logical to think to call them: STEALTH PRECISION BOMBER the current cruise setup + a bonus to expl. radius/velocity per level STEALTH HEAVY B...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.02 07:36:00
|
7. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Tonto Auri Originally by: retro mike Edited by: retro mike on 01/04/2009 22:05:20 Originally by: Tonto Auri Originally by: Vall Kor Those are some good points. For the devs; Why can't we have a ...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.01 22:23:00
|
8. Stealth Bomber - Black Ops: Similar Problems - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Zantaz The purpose of the stealth bomber is to fire torpedoes at battleships from close range. This is it's new, focused role. Love it or leave it. But don't worry, Chronitis will be re-balancing bombs later this spring...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.01 22:18:00
|
9. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Tonto Auri Originally by: Vall Kor Those are some good points. For the devs; Why can't we have a choice between the two (cruise or torp)? Told you - CPU issues. the amount of CPU that allow you to barely fit T1 t...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.01 21:58:00
|
10. stealth bomber - a solution that doesn't involve upsetting people - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I agree, there is nothing wrong with them creating a new type of bomber STEALTH PRECISION BOMBER current cruise setup with bonus to expl radius/velocity STEALTH HEAVY BOMBER to include proposed torpedo setup Done. Simple Btw, CCP will lock...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.01 21:52:00
|
11. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: retro mike on 01/04/2009 19:51:26 Originally by: Carniflex Originally by: Zantaz Can you please explain why I'd bring a ship with under 1k hp to shoot a battleship, instead of my T2 large neutron gank Megathron, or...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.01 19:49:00
|
12. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Seishomaru Originally by: Sebastien LaForge Edited by: Sebastien LaForge on 01/04/2009 17:18:36 Originally by: Seishomaru Learn properly the new game mechanics and discover that QR was a huge BOOST to m...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.01 18:14:00
|
13. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Vall Kor Edited by: Vall Kor on 01/04/2009 13:54:22 All I can say is damage needs to be increased a lot against all targets. Hitting for around the same damage as cruise missile while losing ALL defense is not an improve...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.01 14:00:00
|
14. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: retro mike on 01/04/2009 13:56:06 Ah so the truth comes out with CCP's proposal to buff Black Ops: Quote: For now, we have been able to allow covert cynosural fields to be activated in cynojammed systems so a covert ops flee...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.01 13:54:00
|
15. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: retro mike on 01/04/2009 08:03:48 Originally by: HEPBHOE OKOH4AHUE Edited by: HEPBHOE OKOH4AHUE on 01/04/2009 00:15:49 I vote to leave bombers as is, except modifying explosion radius bonus for cruise missiles to 19,5% ...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.01 08:02:00
|
16. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Defeated Originally by: yani dumyat I like your new ship Chronotis but please can we have 2 ships instead. You'd be our hero and you wouldn't get eaten by sharks Two bomber types would indeed be pure win. May...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.01 06:24:00
|
17. PROPOSAL FOR A MEMORIAL TO THE OLD STEALTH BOMBER IN JITA - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Seeing as CCP Chronotis and his motley crew have already decided on the demise of the cruise bomber, I think it only fitting that a memorial is placed right outside the main staion in Jita to remind us of this sad date. Outragous perhaps? Even si...
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.31 23:34:00
|
18. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Chronotis you have already said what we think doesnt matter. SO YOU THINKS ITS FUNNY? WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE? CCP Chronotis, We both know why you failed to fix cruise explosion velocity to Stealth Bombers after the missile nerf...
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.31 23:22:00
|
19. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Marlenus in a context where CCP appears to be generally trying to reduce encounter ranges (my guess is because of the speed changes from QR). I always engaged my targets a maximum of 40k away. Quote: I liked t...
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.31 14:59:00
|
20. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Chronotis comments on keeping the stealth bomber in its current role CCP Chronotis It is understandable that those of you who have found a good niche and strategy for the stealth bombers and sniping have met with so...
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.31 14:37:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |